Too often, chronic low back pain is misdiagnosed—not because doctors don’t care, but because the tools and assumptions behind the diagnosis fall short. 

A rushed evaluation, incomplete testing, or an overreliance on imaging can send patients down months (or years) of ineffective treatment paths.

Let’s break down the three most common diagnostic mistakes—and why truly resolving your back pain starts with a smarter, more complete approach.

Mistake #1: Dismissing Pain That Doesn’t Match the Scan

The error:Telling patients, “There’s nothing wrong,” or “It’s all in your head,” simply because imaging or basic tests don’t reveal a clear cause.

Why it’s a problem:This shuts down inquiry—and worse, it undermines trust. It also ignores one of the most important truths in pain care: pain is real even when scans are unclear. Many contributors to chronic pain—like nerve sensitization, fascial adhesions, scar tissue, or micro-instability—are invisible on imaging.

Pain is a signal, not a defect. Dismissing it delays healing and sends patients into emotional and physical limbo.

A common example:After a spinal fusion, a patient reports burning pain or a sense of deep instability. The post-op MRI looks fine. They’re told, “It’s just healing.” Months pass. The pain worsens. Only later is it discovered that scar tissueis entrapping nearby nerves, or that the SI joint has destabilized due to altered mechanics.

What real diagnosis requires:

• Staying curious when imaging is inconclusive
• Listening without judgment
• Recognizing that MRI is not omniscient
• Respecting the patient’s experience as a valuable diagnostic clue

Pain that "doesn’t make sense" is often the most important kind to investigate—not dismiss.

Mistake #2: Ignoring Biomechanics

The error:Focusing only on the damaged tissue without evaluating how the body is moving, compensating, or adapting around it.

Why it’s a problem:The spine isn’t just a stack of bones—it’s a dynamic, load-bearing structure. When one segment is injured or surgically altered, the rest of the system must adjust. And those compensations often create new problems: joint overload, muscle fatigue, postural distortion, or functional imbalance.

In many cases, chronic pain isn’t coming from the original injury—it’s coming from how the rest of the body has had to adapt around it.

A common example:A provider prescribes stretches and core exercises for low back pain. But they overlook the patient’s old pelvic rotation or collapsing foot arch—both of which are shifting pressure into the lumbar spine. The real issue? Improper load transfer and kinetic chain dysfunction, not weak abs.

What real diagnosis requires:

• Observing gait, posture, and weight distribution
• Assessing segmental spinal motion and joint behavior under load
• Identifying hidden contributors like leg length imbalance, foot mechanics, or hip restriction

Back pain often reflects a systemic dysfunction, not just a local problem. Until biomechanics are evaluated, recovery remains incomplete.

Mistake #2: Treating the MRI as the Final Word

The error:
Over-relying on imaging—especially MRI scans—to locate or explain the source of pain.

Why it’s a problem:
An MRI reveals structure, not function. That’s critical to understand. Many patients with “clean” MRIs—no disc herniation, no nerve compression—still live in chronic, debilitating pain. Meanwhile, others with significant disc degeneration or bulging discs remain symptom-free and functional.

The reason for this disconnect is simple: pain isn’t always about what’s visible. It’s about what the body does under load, movement, and compensation. Static images can’t show joint instability, muscle guarding, nerve irritation under motion, or dysfunctional biomechanics.

A common example:
A patient who has undergone spinal fusion may have a perfect-looking post-op scan. But their continued pain might come from adjacent segment strain, sacroiliac joint dysfunction, or failed movement patterns—all invisible on a static MRI.

What real diagnosis requires:
To get to the true source of pain, we must go beyond the image. That means:

• Dynamic assessments (how the spine behaves when standing, bending, or walking)
• Weight-bearing tests (not just lying down)
• Hands-on orthopedic and neurologic exams
• Listening carefully to the patient’s movement story—not just reading a film

In short, good diagnosis requires clinical skill, not just technology.